Home > Ionization Science > Technology Comparison
Aerisa’s ionization technology provides a much more complete air quality improvement solution than competing systems.
By utilizing Aerisa solutions:
Competing technologies offer only a partial answer and do so at higher O&M costs than Aerisa technology. Click on the following table for a larger view:
For wastewater H2S-only applications, technologies are appropriate at certain concentrations and airflow rates. Misapplication of technologies lead to excessive capital expenditure, high O&M costs, and poor performance.
Note that some technologies (e.g., high capacity carbon, bio-scrubbers) do well at removing H2S but not other odorous compounds—two technologies may then be necessary.
The following graph identifies what we believe to be capital and O&M cost-competitive application ranges for each identified technology. Note that Aerisa AerSupply and AerExhaust systems fit well for air flow rates above ±2,000 cfm and below ±30 ppm H2S. Contact Aerisa directly or your local Aerisa representative should you have any questions.
Aerisa uses a variety of methods to test the functionality of our products. Customers should evaluate their specific application and environmental conditions when making an assessment regarding the technology’s potential benefits.
Our customers should also use reasonable safety precautions to prevent the transmission of pathogens, including SARS-COV-2. You cannot rely on our products alone to contain it or prevent its spread.
It is important to comply with all applicable public health laws and guidelines issued by federal, state, and local authorities, including guidance published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), including but not limited to social distancing, hand hygiene, cough etiquette, and the use of face masks.